14 Blades vs Man on Fire
Man on Fire has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.3/10 for 14 Blades). 14 Blades is the shorter watch at 1h 54m compared with 2h 26m. Man on Fire is the older of the two (2004 against 2010). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
14 Blades
Man on Fire| 14 Blades | Man on Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.3/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2010 | 2004 |
| Length | 1h 54m | 2h 26m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Daniel Lee | Tony Scott |
| Main cast | Donnie Yen, Sammo Hung, Wu Chun, Wu Ma, Damian Lau Chung-Yan | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke |
Synopsis
14 Blades
Commander Qinglong is the loyal leader of the assassin group that serves the emperor. But when his allies plan a rebellion against the ruler, he finds himself in danger.
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
Where to watch
Where to watch 14 BladesWhere to watch Man on Fire
More like 14 Blades · More like Man on Fire · Compare other titles