1492: Conquest of Paradise vs King Arthur
1492: Conquest of Paradise and King Arthur are tied on audience score (6.3/10). King Arthur is the shorter watch at 2h 6m compared with 2h 34m. 1492: Conquest of Paradise is the older of the two (1992 against 2004). Both are action, adventure, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| 1492: Conquest of Paradise | King Arthur | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.3/10 | ★ 6.3/10 |
| Year | 1992 | 2004 |
| Length | 2h 34m | 2h 6m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, History | Action, Adventure, Drama, History, War |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Ridley Scott | Antoine Fuqua |
| Main cast | Kevin Dunn, Mark Margolis, Armand Assante, Tchéky Karyo, Loren Dean | Ray Stevenson, Joel Edgerton, Keira Knightley, Mads Mikkelsen, Hugh Dancy |
Synopsis
1492: Conquest of Paradise
1492: Conquest of Paradise depicts Christopher Columbus’ discovery of The New World and his effect on the indigenous people.
King Arthur
The story of the Arthurian legend, based on the 'Sarmatian hypothesis' which contends that the legend has a historical nucleus in the Sarmatian heavy cavalry troops stationed in Britain, and that the Roman-British military commander, Lucius Artorius Castus is the historical person behind the legend.
Where to watch
Where to watch 1492: Conquest of ParadiseWhere to watch King Arthur
More like 1492: Conquest of Paradise · More like King Arthur · Compare other titles
1492: Conquest of Paradise
King Arthur