1492: Conquest of Paradise vs Lions for Lambs
1492: Conquest of Paradise has the higher audience score (6.3/10 against 6/10 for Lions for Lambs). Lions for Lambs is the shorter watch at 1h 32m compared with 2h 34m. 1492: Conquest of Paradise is the older of the two (1992 against 2007). Both are action, adventure, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood. Both feature Kevin Dunn.
1492: Conquest of Paradise
Lions for Lambs| 1492: Conquest of Paradise | Lions for Lambs | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.3/10 | ★ 6.0/10 |
| Year | 1992 | 2007 |
| Length | 2h 34m | 1h 32m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Drama, History | Action, Adventure, Drama, History |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Ridley Scott | Robert Redford |
| Main cast | Kevin Dunn, Mark Margolis, Armand Assante, Tchéky Karyo, Loren Dean | Kevin Dunn, Tom Cruise, Derek Luke, Michael Peña, Andrew Garfield |
Synopsis
1492: Conquest of Paradise
1492: Conquest of Paradise depicts Christopher Columbus’ discovery of The New World and his effect on the indigenous people.
Lions for Lambs
Three stories told simultaneously in ninety minutes of real time: a Republican Senator who's a presidential hopeful gives an hour-long interview to a skeptical television reporter, detailing a strategy for victory in Afghanistan; two special forces ambushed on an Afghani ridge await rescue as Taliban forces close in; a poli-sci professor at a California college invites a student to re-engage.
Where to watch
Where to watch 1492: Conquest of ParadiseWhere to watch Lions for Lambs
More like 1492: Conquest of Paradise · More like Lions for Lambs · Compare other titles