2048: Nowhere to Run vs Star Trek: First Contact
Star Trek: First Contact has the higher audience score (7.3/10 against 6.8/10 for 2048: Nowhere to Run). 2048: Nowhere to Run is the shorter watch at 6m compared with 1h 51m. Star Trek: First Contact is the older of the two (1996 against 2017). Both are action, science fiction, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
2048: Nowhere to Run
Star Trek: First Contact| 2048: Nowhere to Run | Star Trek: First Contact | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.8/10 | ★ 7.3/10 |
| Year | 2017 | 1996 |
| Length | 6m | 1h 51m |
| Genres | Action, Science Fiction, Thriller | Action, Adventure, Science Fiction, Thriller |
| Country | United Kingdom | United States of America |
| Director | Luke Scott | Jonathan Frakes |
| Main cast | Dave Bautista, Björn Freiberg, Adam Savage, Gérard Miller, Gaia Ottman | Patrick Stewart, Alfre Woodard, Neal McDonough, Adam Scott, James Cromwell |
Synopsis
2048: Nowhere to Run
“2048: Nowhere to Run” takes place one year before the events of Blade Runner 2049. The short film focuses on Sapper, a man who is trying to make it through life day-by-day without turning back to his old ways. We’re introduced to both the gentle nature of Sapper and the violence he’s capable of when set off.
Star Trek: First Contact
The Borg, a relentless race of cyborgs, are on a direct course for Earth. Violating orders to stay away from the battle, Captain Picard and the crew of the newly-commissioned USS Enterprise E pursue the Borg back in time to prevent the invaders from changing Federation history and assimilating the galaxy.
Where to watch
Where to watch 2048: Nowhere to RunWhere to watch Star Trek: First Contact
More like 2048: Nowhere to Run · More like Star Trek: First Contact · Compare other titles