28 Days Later vs Antiviral
28 Days Later has the higher audience score (7.2/10 against 6/10 for Antiviral). Antiviral is the shorter watch at 1h 50m compared with 1h 53m. 28 Days Later is the older of the two (2002 against 2012). Both are horror, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| 28 Days Later | Antiviral | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.2/10 | ★ 6.0/10 |
| Year | 2002 | 2012 |
| Length | 1h 53m | 1h 50m |
| Genres | Horror, Science Fiction, Thriller | Horror, Science Fiction |
| Country | – | Canada |
| Director | Danny Boyle | Brandon Cronenberg |
| Main cast | Leo Bill, Cillian Murphy, Ray Panthaki, Brendan Gleeson, Christopher Eccleston | Malcolm McDowell, Nicholas Campbell, Douglas Smith, Wendy Crewson, Joe Pingue |
Synopsis
28 Days Later
Twenty-eight days after a killer virus was accidentally unleashed from a British research facility, a small group of London survivors are caught in a desperate struggle to protect themselves from the infected. Carried by animals and humans, the virus turns those it infects into homicidal maniacs -- and it's absolutely impossible to contain.
Antiviral
Syd March is an employee at a clinic that sells injections of live viruses harvested from sick celebrities to obsessed fans. When he becomes infected with the disease that kills super sensation Hannah Geist, Syd becomes a target for collectors and rabid fans. He must unravel the mystery surrounding her death before he suffers the same fate.
Where to watch
Where to watch 28 Days LaterWhere to watch Antiviral
More like 28 Days Later · More like Antiviral · Compare other titles
28 Days Later
Antiviral