28 Days Later vs Books of Blood
28 Days Later has the higher audience score (7.2/10 against 6.3/10 for Books of Blood). Books of Blood is the shorter watch at 1h 47m compared with 1h 53m. 28 Days Later is the older of the two (2002 against 2020). Both are horror, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| 28 Days Later | Books of Blood | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.2/10 | ★ 6.3/10 |
| Year | 2002 | 2020 |
| Length | 1h 53m | 1h 47m |
| Genres | Horror, Science Fiction, Thriller | Horror, Science Fiction |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Danny Boyle | Brannon Braga |
| Main cast | Leo Bill, Cillian Murphy, Ray Panthaki, Brendan Gleeson, Christopher Eccleston | Andy McQueen, Nicholas Campbell, Freda Foh Shen, Britt Robertson, Yul Vazquez |
Synopsis
28 Days Later
Twenty-eight days after a killer virus was accidentally unleashed from a British research facility, a small group of London survivors are caught in a desperate struggle to protect themselves from the infected. Carried by animals and humans, the virus turns those it infects into homicidal maniacs -- and it's absolutely impossible to contain.
Books of Blood
A journey into uncharted and forbidden territory through three tales tangled in space and time.
Where to watch
Where to watch 28 Days LaterWhere to watch Books of Blood
More like 28 Days Later · More like Books of Blood · Compare other titles
28 Days Later
Books of Blood