28 Days Later vs Stem Cell
28 Days Later has the higher audience score (7.2/10 against 2/10 for Stem Cell). Stem Cell is the shorter watch at 1h 26m compared with 1h 53m. 28 Days Later is the older of the two (2002 against 2009). Both are horror, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| 28 Days Later | Stem Cell | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.2/10 | ★ 2.0/10 |
| Year | 2002 | 2009 |
| Length | 1h 53m | 1h 26m |
| Genres | Horror, Science Fiction, Thriller | Horror, Science Fiction |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Danny Boyle | David DeCoteau |
| Main cast | Leo Bill, Cillian Murphy, Ray Panthaki, Brendan Gleeson, Christopher Eccleston | Jason-Shane Scott, Brian Gross, Dee Wallace, Darcy Fowers, Benjamin Scott Perry |
Synopsis
28 Days Later
Twenty-eight days after a killer virus was accidentally unleashed from a British research facility, a small group of London survivors are caught in a desperate struggle to protect themselves from the infected. Carried by animals and humans, the virus turns those it infects into homicidal maniacs -- and it's absolutely impossible to contain.
Stem Cell
Rita heads to the mountains to get some peace and recover from mental distress. While there she meets Pierce, a doctor doing stem cell research whose experiments have gone horribly wrong. Now Rita is the only one who can solve the problem.
Where to watch
Where to watch 28 Days LaterWhere to watch Stem Cell
More like 28 Days Later · More like Stem Cell · Compare other titles
28 Days Later
Stem Cell