28 Days Later vs World War Z
28 Days Later has the higher audience score (7.2/10 against 6.8/10 for World War Z). 28 Days Later is the shorter watch at 1h 53m compared with 1h 56m. 28 Days Later is the older of the two (2002 against 2013). Both are horror, science fiction, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| 28 Days Later | World War Z | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.2/10 | ★ 6.8/10 |
| Year | 2002 | 2013 |
| Length | 1h 53m | 1h 56m |
| Genres | Horror, Science Fiction, Thriller | Action, Horror, Science Fiction, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Danny Boyle | Marc Forster |
| Main cast | Leo Bill, Cillian Murphy, Ray Panthaki, Brendan Gleeson, Christopher Eccleston | Matthew Fox, Ruth Negga, Elyes Gabel, Mireille Enos, James Badge Dale |
Synopsis
28 Days Later
Twenty-eight days after a killer virus was accidentally unleashed from a British research facility, a small group of London survivors are caught in a desperate struggle to protect themselves from the infected. Carried by animals and humans, the virus turns those it infects into homicidal maniacs -- and it's absolutely impossible to contain.
World War Z
Life for former United Nations investigator Gerry Lane and his family seems content. Suddenly, the world is plagued by a mysterious infection turning whole human populations into rampaging mindless zombies. After barely escaping the chaos, Lane is persuaded to go on a mission to investigate this disease. What follows is a perilous trek around the world where Lane must brave horrific dangers and long odds to find answers before human…
Where to watch
Where to watch 28 Days LaterWhere to watch World War Z
More like 28 Days Later · More like World War Z · Compare other titles
28 Days Later
World War Z