28 Weeks Later vs World War Z
World War Z has the higher audience score (6.8/10 against 6.6/10 for 28 Weeks Later). 28 Weeks Later is the shorter watch at 1h 40m compared with 1h 56m. 28 Weeks Later is the older of the two (2007 against 2013). Both are horror, science fiction, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
28 Weeks Later
World War Z| 28 Weeks Later | World War Z | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.6/10 | ★ 6.8/10 |
| Year | 2007 | 2013 |
| Length | 1h 40m | 1h 56m |
| Genres | Horror, Science Fiction, Thriller | Action, Horror, Science Fiction, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Juan Carlos Fresnadillo | Marc Forster |
| Main cast | Emily Beecham, Jeremy Renner, Idris Elba, Harold Perrineau, Imogen Poots | Matthew Fox, Ruth Negga, Elyes Gabel, Mireille Enos, James Badge Dale |
Synopsis
28 Weeks Later
Twenty-eight weeks after the spread of a deadly rage virus, the inhabitants of the British Isles have lost their battle against the onslaught, as the virus has killed everyone there. Six months later, a group of Americans dare to set foot on the Isles, convinced the danger has passed. But it soon becomes all too clear that the scourge continues to live, waiting to pounce on its next victims.
World War Z
Life for former United Nations investigator Gerry Lane and his family seems content. Suddenly, the world is plagued by a mysterious infection turning whole human populations into rampaging mindless zombies. After barely escaping the chaos, Lane is persuaded to go on a mission to investigate this disease. What follows is a perilous trek around the world where Lane must brave horrific dangers and long odds to find answers before human…
Where to watch
Where to watch 28 Weeks LaterWhere to watch World War Z
More like 28 Weeks Later · More like World War Z · Compare other titles