3 Days to Kill vs Man on Fire
Man on Fire has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.1/10 for 3 Days to Kill). 3 Days to Kill is the shorter watch at 1h 53m compared with 2h 26m. Man on Fire is the older of the two (2004 against 2014). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
3 Days to Kill
Man on Fire| 3 Days to Kill | Man on Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.1/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2014 | 2004 |
| Length | 1h 53m | 2h 26m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | McG | Tony Scott |
| Main cast | Hailee Steinfeld, Richard Sammel, Ériq Ebouaney, Kevin Costner, Connie Nielsen | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke |
Synopsis
3 Days to Kill
A dangerous international spy is determined to give up his high stakes life to finally build a closer relationship with his estranged wife and daughter. But first, he must complete one last mission - even if it means juggling the two toughest assignments yet: hunting down the world's most ruthless terrorist and looking after his teenage daughter for the first time in ten years, while his wife is out of town.
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
Where to watch
Where to watch 3 Days to KillWhere to watch Man on Fire
More like 3 Days to Kill · More like Man on Fire · Compare other titles