300: Rise of an Empire vs Legends of the Fall
Legends of the Fall has the higher audience score (7.4/10 against 6.1/10 for 300: Rise of an Empire). 300: Rise of an Empire is the shorter watch at 1h 42m compared with 2h 13m. Legends of the Fall is the older of the two (1994 against 2014). Both are action, drama, war movies, so they suit a similar mood.
300: Rise of an Empire
Legends of the Fall| 300: Rise of an Empire | Legends of the Fall | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.1/10 | ★ 7.4/10 |
| Year | 2014 | 1994 |
| Length | 1h 42m | 2h 13m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, War | Action, Drama, Romance, War, Western |
| Country | Bulgaria | United States of America |
| Director | Noam Murro | Edward Zwick |
| Main cast | Lena Headey, Eva Green, Sullivan Stapleton, Jack O'Connell, David Wenham | Julia Ormond, Anthony Hopkins, Henry Thomas, Aidan Quinn, Brad Pitt |
Synopsis
300: Rise of an Empire
Greek general Themistocles attempts to unite all of Greece by leading the charge that will change the course of the war. Themistocles faces the massive invading Persian forces led by mortal-turned-god, Xerxes and Artemesia, the vengeful commander of the Persian navy.
Legends of the Fall
In early 20th-century Montana, Col. William Ludlow lives on a ranch in the wilderness with his sons, Alfred, Tristan, and Samuel. Eventually, the unconventional but close-knit family are bound by loyalty, tested by war, and torn apart by love, as told over the course of several decades in this epic saga.
Where to watch
Where to watch 300: Rise of an EmpireWhere to watch Legends of the Fall
More like 300: Rise of an Empire · More like Legends of the Fall · Compare other titles