300: Rise of an Empire vs Lone Survivor
Lone Survivor has the higher audience score (7.4/10 against 6.1/10 for 300: Rise of an Empire). 300: Rise of an Empire is the shorter watch at 1h 42m compared with 2h 1m. Lone Survivor is the older of the two (2013 against 2014). Both are action, drama, war movies, so they suit a similar mood.
300: Rise of an Empire
Lone Survivor| 300: Rise of an Empire | Lone Survivor | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.1/10 | ★ 7.4/10 |
| Year | 2014 | 2013 |
| Length | 1h 42m | 2h 1m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, War | Action, Drama, War |
| Country | Bulgaria | – |
| Director | Noam Murro | Peter Berg |
| Main cast | Lena Headey, Eva Green, Sullivan Stapleton, Jack O'Connell, David Wenham | Alexander Ludwig, Jerry Ferrara, Taylor Kitsch, Ali Suliman, Eric Bana |
Synopsis
300: Rise of an Empire
Greek general Themistocles attempts to unite all of Greece by leading the charge that will change the course of the war. Themistocles faces the massive invading Persian forces led by mortal-turned-god, Xerxes and Artemesia, the vengeful commander of the Persian navy.
Lone Survivor
Four Navy SEALs on a covert mission to neutralize a high-level Taliban operative must make an impossible moral decision in the mountains of Afghanistan that leads them into an enemy ambush. As they confront unthinkable odds, the SEALs must find reserves of strength and resilience to fight to the finish.
Where to watch
Where to watch 300: Rise of an EmpireWhere to watch Lone Survivor
More like 300: Rise of an Empire · More like Lone Survivor · Compare other titles