3:10 to Yuma vs Soft Shoes
Soft Shoes has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 7.2/10 for 3:10 to Yuma). Soft Shoes is the shorter watch at 46m compared with 2h 2m. Soft Shoes is the older of the two (1925 against 2007). Both are western movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| 3:10 to Yuma | Soft Shoes | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.2/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2007 | 1925 |
| Length | 2h 2m | 46m |
| Genres | Western | Comedy, Crime, Romance, Western |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | James Mangold | Lloyd Ingraham |
| Main cast | Gretchen Mol, Alan Tudyk, Kevin Durand, Logan Lerman, Russell Crowe | James Quinn, John Steppling, Francis Ford, Harry Carey, Lillian Rich |
Synopsis
3:10 to Yuma
In Arizona in the late 1800s, infamous outlaw Ben Wade and his vicious gang of thieves and murderers have plagued the Southern Railroad. When Wade is captured, Civil War veteran Dan Evans, struggling to survive on his drought-plagued ranch, volunteers to deliver him alive to the "3:10 to Yuma", a train that will take the killer to trial.
Soft Shoes
Sheriff Pat Halahan comes into an inheritance and travels to San Francisco to collect. Faith O’Day, a cat burglar armed with pistol and flashlight breaks into his hotel room and demands that Halahan cough up his dough. Halahan sees her threat and raises her a one-dollar bet that he can return a brooch she stole earlier the same evening before its loss is discovered. Pulling off his boots to slip on his own “soft shoes,” Halahan sets off to do a…
Where to watch
Where to watch 3:10 to YumaWhere to watch Soft Shoes
More like 3:10 to Yuma · More like Soft Shoes · Compare other titles
3:10 to Yuma
Soft Shoes