32 Malasana Street vs Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me has the higher audience score (7.4/10 against 6.5/10 for 32 Malasana Street). 32 Malasana Street is the shorter watch at 1h 45m compared with 2h 15m. Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me is the older of the two (1992 against 2020). Both are drama, horror movies, so they suit a similar mood.
32 Malasana Street
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me| 32 Malasana Street | Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.5/10 | ★ 7.4/10 |
| Year | 2020 | 1992 |
| Length | 1h 45m | 2h 15m |
| Genres | Drama, Horror | Drama, Horror, Mystery |
| Country | Spain | – |
| Director | Albert Pintó | David Lynch |
| Main cast | Eduardo Antuña, Javier Botet, Sergio Castellanos, Bea Segura, María Ballesteros | Pamela Gidley, Mädchen Amick, Miguel Ferrer, Heather Graham, Ray Wise |
Synopsis
32 Malasana Street
Malasaña neighborhood, Madrid, Spain, 1976. While political turmoil ravages the streets all over the country, the Olmedo family arrives in the big city and settles into their new apartment. They soon discover that they are not the only ones roaming its corridors.
Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me
In the questionable town of Deer Meadow, Washington, FBI Agent Desmond inexplicably disappears while hunting for the man who murdered a teen girl. The killer is never apprehended, and, after experiencing dark visions and supernatural encounters, Agent Dale Cooper chillingly predicts that the culprit will claim another life. Meanwhile, in the more cozy town of Twin Peaks, hedonistic beauty Laura Palmer hangs with lowlifes and seems destined for…
Where to watch
Where to watch 32 Malasana StreetWhere to watch Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me
More like 32 Malasana Street · More like Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me · Compare other titles