40 Days and 40 Nights vs In a Heartbeat
In a Heartbeat has the higher audience score (8/10 against 5.5/10 for 40 Days and 40 Nights). In a Heartbeat is the shorter watch at 4m compared with 1h 34m. 40 Days and 40 Nights is the older of the two (2002 against 2017). Both are comedy, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
40 Days and 40 Nights
In a Heartbeat| 40 Days and 40 Nights | In a Heartbeat | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.5/10 | ★ 8.0/10 |
| Year | 2002 | 2017 |
| Length | 1h 34m | 4m |
| Genres | Comedy, Romance | Animation, Comedy, Romance |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Michael Lehmann | Beth David, Esteban Bravo |
| Main cast | Josh Hartnett, Paulo Costanzo, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Glenn Fitzgerald, Griffin Dunne | Nick Ainsworth, Kelly Donohue |
Synopsis
40 Days and 40 Nights
Matt Sullivan's last big relationship ended in disaster and ever since his heart's been aching and his commitment's been lacking. Then came Lent, that time of year when everybody gives something up. That's when Matt decides to go where no man's gone before and make a vow: No sex. Whatsoever. For 40 straight days. At first he has everything under control. That is until the woman of his dreams, Erica, walks into his life.
In a Heartbeat
A closeted boy runs the risk of being outed by his own heart after it pops out of his chest to chase down the boy of his dreams.
Where to watch
Where to watch 40 Days and 40 NightsWhere to watch In a Heartbeat
More like 40 Days and 40 Nights · More like In a Heartbeat · Compare other titles