A Cure for Wellness vs Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 6.3/10 for A Cure for Wellness). Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the shorter watch at 1h 2m compared with 2h 26m. Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the older of the two (2009 against 2017). Both are horror, mystery, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.
A Cure for Wellness
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars| A Cure for Wellness | Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.3/10 | ★ 7.9/10 |
| Year | 2017 | 2009 |
| Length | 2h 26m | 1h 2m |
| Genres | Horror, Mystery, Science Fiction | Adventure, Drama, Horror, Mystery, Science Fiction, TV Movie |
| Country | – | United Kingdom |
| Director | Gore Verbinski | Graeme Harper |
| Main cast | Dane DeHaan, Jason Isaacs, Carl Lumbly, Mia Goth, Magnus Krepper | Lindsay Duncan, David Tennant, Gemma Chan, Michael Goldsmith, Sharon Duncan-Brewster |
Synopsis
A Cure for Wellness
An ambitious young executive is sent to retrieve his company's CEO from an idyllic but mysterious "wellness center" at a remote location in the Swiss Alps but soon suspects that the spa's miraculous treatments are not what they seem.
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
In a Mars base, the inhabitants are being infected by a mysterious water creature which takes over its victims. The Doctor is thrust into the middle of this catastrophe, knowing a larger one is waiting around the corner.
Where to watch
Where to watch A Cure for WellnessWhere to watch Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
More like A Cure for Wellness · More like Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars · Compare other titles