A Cure for Wellness vs Quarantine 2: Terminal
A Cure for Wellness has the higher audience score (6.3/10 against 5.7/10 for Quarantine 2: Terminal). Quarantine 2: Terminal is the shorter watch at 1h 26m compared with 2h 26m. Quarantine 2: Terminal is the older of the two (2011 against 2017). Both are horror, mystery, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.
A Cure for Wellness
Quarantine 2: Terminal| A Cure for Wellness | Quarantine 2: Terminal | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.3/10 | ★ 5.7/10 |
| Year | 2017 | 2011 |
| Length | 2h 26m | 1h 26m |
| Genres | Horror, Mystery, Science Fiction | Horror, Mystery, Science Fiction |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Gore Verbinski | John Pogue |
| Main cast | Dane DeHaan, Jason Isaacs, Carl Lumbly, Mia Goth, Magnus Krepper | Ignacio Serricchio, Bre Blair, Sandra Ellis Lafferty, Mattie Liptak, Noree Victoria |
Synopsis
A Cure for Wellness
An ambitious young executive is sent to retrieve his company's CEO from an idyllic but mysterious "wellness center" at a remote location in the Swiss Alps but soon suspects that the spa's miraculous treatments are not what they seem.
Quarantine 2: Terminal
A plane is taken over by a mysterious virus. When the plane lands it is placed under quarantine. Now a group of survivors must band together to survive the quarantine.
Where to watch
Where to watch A Cure for WellnessWhere to watch Quarantine 2: Terminal
More like A Cure for Wellness · More like Quarantine 2: Terminal · Compare other titles