A Field in England vs A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors

A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors has the higher audience score (6.7/10 against 6.2/10 for A Field in England). A Field in England is the shorter watch at 1h 30m compared with 1h 36m. A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors is the older of the two (1987 against 2013). Both are fantasy, horror, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.

A Field in England posterA Field in England2013 VS A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors posterA Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors1987
A Field in EnglandA Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors
Audience score★ 6.2/10★ 6.7/10
Year20131987
Length1h 30m1h 36m
GenresFantasy, Horror, ThrillerFantasy, Horror, Thriller
Country––
DirectorBen WheatleyChuck Russell
Main castReece Shearsmith, Peter Ferdinando, Michael Smiley, Richard Glover, Ryan PopeLaurence Fishburne, Patricia Arquette, Robert Englund, Heather Langenkamp, Priscilla Pointer

Synopsis

A Field in England

During the Civil War in 17th-Century England, a small group of deserters flee from a raging battle through an overgrown field. They are captured by an alchemist, who forces the group to aid him in his search to find a hidden treasure that he believes is buried in the field. Crossing a vast mushroom circle, which provides their first meal, the group quickly descend into a chaos of arguments, fighting and paranoia, and, as it becomes clear that…

A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors

During a hallucinatory incident, Kristen Parker has her wrists slashed by dream-stalking monster, Freddy Krueger. Her mother, mistaking the wounds for a suicide attempt, sends her to a psychiatric ward, where she joins a group of similarly troubled teens.

Where to watch

Where to watch A Field in EnglandWhere to watch A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors

More like A Field in England · More like A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors · Compare other titles