A Field in England vs A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors
A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors has the higher audience score (6.7/10 against 6.2/10 for A Field in England). A Field in England is the shorter watch at 1h 30m compared with 1h 36m. A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors is the older of the two (1987 against 2013). Both are fantasy, horror, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| A Field in England | A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.2/10 | ★ 6.7/10 |
| Year | 2013 | 1987 |
| Length | 1h 30m | 1h 36m |
| Genres | Fantasy, Horror, Thriller | Fantasy, Horror, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Ben Wheatley | Chuck Russell |
| Main cast | Reece Shearsmith, Peter Ferdinando, Michael Smiley, Richard Glover, Ryan Pope | Laurence Fishburne, Patricia Arquette, Robert Englund, Heather Langenkamp, Priscilla Pointer |
Synopsis
A Field in England
During the Civil War in 17th-Century England, a small group of deserters flee from a raging battle through an overgrown field. They are captured by an alchemist, who forces the group to aid him in his search to find a hidden treasure that he believes is buried in the field. Crossing a vast mushroom circle, which provides their first meal, the group quickly descend into a chaos of arguments, fighting and paranoia, and, as it becomes clear that…
A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors
During a hallucinatory incident, Kristen Parker has her wrists slashed by dream-stalking monster, Freddy Krueger. Her mother, mistaking the wounds for a suicide attempt, sends her to a psychiatric ward, where she joins a group of similarly troubled teens.
Where to watch
Where to watch A Field in EnglandWhere to watch A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors
More like A Field in England · More like A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors · Compare other titles
A Field in England
A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors