A Field in England vs Dust Bunny
Dust Bunny has the higher audience score (7/10 against 6.2/10 for A Field in England). A Field in England is the shorter watch at 1h 30m compared with 1h 46m. A Field in England is the older of the two (2013 against 2025). Both are fantasy, horror, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
A Field in England
Dust Bunny| A Field in England | Dust Bunny | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.2/10 | ★ 7.0/10 |
| Year | 2013 | 2025 |
| Length | 1h 30m | 1h 46m |
| Genres | Fantasy, Horror, Thriller | Action, Fantasy, Horror, Thriller |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | Ben Wheatley | Bryan Fuller |
| Main cast | Reece Shearsmith, Peter Ferdinando, Michael Smiley, Richard Glover, Ryan Pope | Mads Mikkelsen, David Dastmalchian, Caspar Phillipson, Sigourney Weaver, Sheila Atim |
Synopsis
A Field in England
During the Civil War in 17th-Century England, a small group of deserters flee from a raging battle through an overgrown field. They are captured by an alchemist, who forces the group to aid him in his search to find a hidden treasure that he believes is buried in the field. Crossing a vast mushroom circle, which provides their first meal, the group quickly descend into a chaos of arguments, fighting and paranoia, and, as it becomes clear that…
Dust Bunny
Ten-year-old Aurora asks her hitman neighbor to kill the monster she believes ate her entire family. To protect her, he'll need to battle an onslaught of assassins while accepting the fact that some monsters are real.
Where to watch
Where to watch A Field in EnglandWhere to watch Dust Bunny
More like A Field in England · More like Dust Bunny · Compare other titles