A Field in England vs Spell
Spell has the higher audience score (6.5/10 against 6.2/10 for A Field in England). A Field in England is the shorter watch at 1h 30m compared with 1h 31m. A Field in England is the older of the two (2013 against 2020). Both are fantasy, horror, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
A Field in England
Spell| A Field in England | Spell | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.2/10 | ★ 6.5/10 |
| Year | 2013 | 2020 |
| Length | 1h 30m | 1h 31m |
| Genres | Fantasy, Horror, Thriller | Fantasy, Horror, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Ben Wheatley | Mark Tonderai |
| Main cast | Reece Shearsmith, Peter Ferdinando, Michael Smiley, Richard Glover, Ryan Pope | Omari Hardwick, Loretta Devine, John Beasley, André Jacobs, Peter Butler |
Synopsis
A Field in England
During the Civil War in 17th-Century England, a small group of deserters flee from a raging battle through an overgrown field. They are captured by an alchemist, who forces the group to aid him in his search to find a hidden treasure that he believes is buried in the field. Crossing a vast mushroom circle, which provides their first meal, the group quickly descend into a chaos of arguments, fighting and paranoia, and, as it becomes clear that…
Spell
A father survives a plane crash in rural Appalachia, but becomes suspicious of the elderly couple who take him in to nurse him back to health with the ancient remedies.
Where to watch
Where to watch A Field in EnglandWhere to watch Spell
More like A Field in England · More like Spell · Compare other titles