A Fish Called Wanda vs Estômago: A Gastronomic Story
Estômago: A Gastronomic Story has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 7.2/10 for A Fish Called Wanda). A Fish Called Wanda is the shorter watch at 1h 49m compared with 1h 53m. A Fish Called Wanda is the older of the two (1988 against 2007). Both are comedy, crime movies, so they suit a similar mood.
A Fish Called Wanda
Estômago: A Gastronomic Story| A Fish Called Wanda | Estômago: A Gastronomic Story | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.2/10 | ★ 7.9/10 |
| Year | 1988 | 2007 |
| Length | 1h 49m | 1h 53m |
| Genres | Comedy, Crime | Comedy, Crime, Drama, Mystery |
| Country | United Kingdom | – |
| Director | Charles Crichton | Marcos Jorge |
| Main cast | Kevin Kline, Ken Campbell, Jamie Lee Curtis, John Cleese, Stephen Fry | Fabiula Nascimento, João Miguel, Babu Santana, Carlo Briani, Zeca Cenovicz |
Synopsis
A Fish Called Wanda
While a diamond advocate attempts to steal a collection of diamonds, troubles arise when he realises he’s not the only one after the collection.
Estômago: A Gastronomic Story
In a dog-eat-dog world, Raimundo Nonato has found an alternative way to move ahead: he cooks. No matter what social strata this deceptively innocent young man inhabits, he hones his skills and sharpens his knives—and then he falls in love. Jorge's nimble comic fable provides a smartly constructed gastronomic allegory for ambition and survival.
Where to watch
Where to watch A Fish Called WandaWhere to watch Estômago: A Gastronomic Story
More like A Fish Called Wanda · More like Estômago: A Gastronomic Story · Compare other titles