A Hitman in London vs Blood and Diamonds
Blood and Diamonds has the higher audience score (8/10 against 4.2/10 for A Hitman in London). Blood and Diamonds is the older of the two (1964 against 2015). Both are action, crime movies, so they suit a similar mood.
A Hitman in London
Blood and Diamonds| A Hitman in London | Blood and Diamonds | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 4.2/10 | ★ 8.0/10 |
| Year | 2015 | 1964 |
| Length | 1h 37m | 1h 37m |
| Genres | Action, Crime | Action, Crime |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Ara Paiaya | Jun Fukuda |
| Main cast | Jeff Fahey, Alan Ford, Michael Madsen, Mickey Rourke, Dominique Swain | 임진웅, Makoto Satō, Kumi Mizuno, Akira Takarada, Yū Fujiki |
Synopsis
A Hitman in London
After his last assignment ended with the death of an innocent woman, a hitman's new job in London is compromised when he is overcome with guilt, and ends up helping a desperate woman who is caught up in a human trafficking operation.
Blood and Diamonds
A group of criminals whose diamond heist goes wrong retreat to a WWII era bunker where tensions begin to rise.
Where to watch
Where to watch A Hitman in LondonWhere to watch Blood and Diamonds
More like A Hitman in London · More like Blood and Diamonds · Compare other titles