A Marriage of Convenience vs A Princess for Christmas

A Princess for Christmas has the higher audience score (7/10 against 5.8/10 for A Marriage of Convenience). A Princess for Christmas is the shorter watch at 1h 31m compared with 1h 32m. A Marriage of Convenience is the older of the two (1998 against 2011). Both are drama, romance, tv movie movies, so they suit a similar mood.

A Marriage of Convenience posterA Marriage of Convenience1998 VS A Princess for Christmas posterA Princess for Christmas2011
A Marriage of ConvenienceA Princess for Christmas
Audience score★ 5.8/10★ 7.0/10
Year19982011
Length1h 32m1h 31m
GenresDrama, Romance, TV MovieComedy, Drama, Family, Romance, TV Movie
Country–United States of America
DirectorJames KeachMichael Damian
Main castDavid Kaye, Lorena Gale, Jane Seymour, James Brolin, Shirley KnightKatie McGrath, Sam Heughan, Roger Moore, Răzvan Oprea, Miles Richardson

Synopsis

A Marriage of Convenience

Succesful businesswoman Chris Winslow gives up her career to raise her deceased sister's son, Kevin. Eight years later, she must contend with the boy's father who was unaware of his son's existence. Prompted by a wise judge, they decide to enter into a marriage of convenience in order to not upset the child, though they soon find that they may just be in love after all.

A Princess for Christmas

After her sister and brother-in-law's tragic deaths, an American woman who is the guardian for her young niece and nephew is invited to a royal European castle for Christmas by her late brother-in-law's father, the Duke of Castlebury. Feeling out of place as a commoner, she is determined to give her family a merry Christmas and surprises herself when she falls for a handsome prince.

Where to watch

Where to watch A Marriage of ConvenienceWhere to watch A Princess for Christmas

More like A Marriage of Convenience · More like A Princess for Christmas · Compare other titles