A Princess for Christmas vs Champagne Charlie
A Princess for Christmas has the higher audience score (7/10 against 5.3/10 for Champagne Charlie). A Princess for Christmas is the shorter watch at 1h 31m compared with 3h 10m. Champagne Charlie is the older of the two (1989 against 2011). Both are drama, romance, tv movie movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| A Princess for Christmas | Champagne Charlie | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.0/10 | ★ 5.3/10 |
| Year | 2011 | 1989 |
| Length | 1h 31m | 3h 10m |
| Genres | Comedy, Drama, Family, Romance, TV Movie | Adventure, Drama, Romance, TV Movie |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Michael Damian | Allan Eastman |
| Main cast | Katie McGrath, Sam Heughan, Roger Moore, Răzvan Oprea, Miles Richardson | Hugh Grant, Kenneth Welsh, Denis Forest, Stéphane Audran, Alexandra Stewart |
Synopsis
A Princess for Christmas
After her sister and brother-in-law's tragic deaths, an American woman who is the guardian for her young niece and nephew is invited to a royal European castle for Christmas by her late brother-in-law's father, the Duke of Castlebury. Feeling out of place as a commoner, she is determined to give her family a merry Christmas and surprises herself when she falls for a handsome prince.
Champagne Charlie
This is the story of the Charles Heidsieck who opened the market for Champagne sales in America just prior to the American Civil War. He is a reluctant French spy and is captured and spends time in a Union prison. There are two parallel love stories (he is French) and some battles with his uncle for control of the family vineyard (because his father married his mother who the uncle also loved).
Where to watch
Where to watch A Princess for ChristmasWhere to watch Champagne Charlie
More like A Princess for Christmas · More like Champagne Charlie · Compare other titles
A Princess for Christmas
Champagne Charlie