A Princess for Christmas vs Material Girls
A Princess for Christmas has the higher audience score (7/10 against 5.3/10 for Material Girls). A Princess for Christmas is the shorter watch at 1h 31m compared with 1h 37m. Material Girls is the older of the two (2006 against 2011). Both are comedy, family, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
A Princess for Christmas
Material Girls| A Princess for Christmas | Material Girls | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.0/10 | ★ 5.3/10 |
| Year | 2011 | 2006 |
| Length | 1h 31m | 1h 37m |
| Genres | Comedy, Drama, Family, Romance, TV Movie | Comedy, Family, Romance |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Michael Damian | Martha Coolidge |
| Main cast | Katie McGrath, Sam Heughan, Roger Moore, Răzvan Oprea, Miles Richardson | Colleen Camp, Anjelica Huston, María Conchita Alonso, Lukas Haas, Obba Babatundé |
Synopsis
A Princess for Christmas
After her sister and brother-in-law's tragic deaths, an American woman who is the guardian for her young niece and nephew is invited to a royal European castle for Christmas by her late brother-in-law's father, the Duke of Castlebury. Feeling out of place as a commoner, she is determined to give her family a merry Christmas and surprises herself when she falls for a handsome prince.
Material Girls
Two wealthy sisters, both heiresses to their family's cosmetics fortune, are given a wake-up call when a scandal and ensuing investigation strip them of their wealth.
Where to watch
Where to watch A Princess for ChristmasWhere to watch Material Girls
More like A Princess for Christmas · More like Material Girls · Compare other titles