A Princess for Christmas vs Tears in the Rain
A Princess for Christmas has the higher audience score (7/10 against 4.9/10 for Tears in the Rain). A Princess for Christmas is the shorter watch at 1h 31m compared with 1h 40m. Tears in the Rain is the older of the two (1988 against 2011). Both are drama, romance, tv movie movies, so they suit a similar mood.
A Princess for Christmas
Tears in the Rain| A Princess for Christmas | Tears in the Rain | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.0/10 | ★ 4.9/10 |
| Year | 2011 | 1988 |
| Length | 1h 31m | 1h 40m |
| Genres | Comedy, Drama, Family, Romance, TV Movie | Drama, Romance, TV Movie |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Michael Damian | Don Sharp |
| Main cast | Katie McGrath, Sam Heughan, Roger Moore, Răzvan Oprea, Miles Richardson | Sharon Stone, Leigh Lawson, Christopher Cazenove, Anna Massey, Stephanie Cole |
Synopsis
A Princess for Christmas
After her sister and brother-in-law's tragic deaths, an American woman who is the guardian for her young niece and nephew is invited to a royal European castle for Christmas by her late brother-in-law's father, the Duke of Castlebury. Feeling out of place as a commoner, she is determined to give her family a merry Christmas and surprises herself when she falls for a handsome prince.
Tears in the Rain
When Casey Cantrell's mother died, her last wish was that her daughter would give a letter to Lord Richard Bredon, living in the UK. When Casey arrives in London, Lord Bredon denies ever having known her mother.
Where to watch
Where to watch A Princess for ChristmasWhere to watch Tears in the Rain
More like A Princess for Christmas · More like Tears in the Rain · Compare other titles