A Princess for Christmas vs We'll Take Manhattan
A Princess for Christmas has the higher audience score (7/10 against 5.5/10 for We'll Take Manhattan). We'll Take Manhattan is the shorter watch at 1h 30m compared with 1h 31m. A Princess for Christmas is the older of the two (2011 against 2012). Both are drama, romance, tv movie movies, so they suit a similar mood.
A Princess for Christmas
We'll Take Manhattan| A Princess for Christmas | We'll Take Manhattan | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.0/10 | ★ 5.5/10 |
| Year | 2011 | 2012 |
| Length | 1h 31m | 1h 30m |
| Genres | Comedy, Drama, Family, Romance, TV Movie | Drama, Romance, TV Movie |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Michael Damian | John McKay |
| Main cast | Katie McGrath, Sam Heughan, Roger Moore, Răzvan Oprea, Miles Richardson | Aneurin Barnard, Frances Barber, Natasha Little, Helen McCrory, Karen Gillan |
Synopsis
A Princess for Christmas
After her sister and brother-in-law's tragic deaths, an American woman who is the guardian for her young niece and nephew is invited to a royal European castle for Christmas by her late brother-in-law's father, the Duke of Castlebury. Feeling out of place as a commoner, she is determined to give her family a merry Christmas and surprises herself when she falls for a handsome prince.
We'll Take Manhattan
We’ll Take Manhattan explores the explosive love affair between sixties supermodel Jean Shrimpton and photographer David Bailey. Focusing on a wild and unpredictable 1962 Vogue photo shoot in New York, the drama brings to life the story of two young people falling in love, misbehaving and inadvertently defining the style of the Sixties along the way.
Where to watch
Where to watch A Princess for ChristmasWhere to watch We'll Take Manhattan
More like A Princess for Christmas · More like We'll Take Manhattan · Compare other titles