A Sad and Beautiful World vs Lost in Translation
A Sad and Beautiful World has the higher audience score (8/10 against 7.4/10 for Lost in Translation). Lost in Translation is the shorter watch at 1h 42m compared with 1h 50m. Lost in Translation is the older of the two (2003 against 2025). Both are comedy, drama, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
A Sad and Beautiful World
Lost in Translation| A Sad and Beautiful World | Lost in Translation | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 8.0/10 | ★ 7.4/10 |
| Year | 2025 | 2003 |
| Length | 1h 50m | 1h 42m |
| Genres | Comedy, Drama, Romance | Comedy, Drama, Romance |
| Country | Lebanon | – |
| Director | Cyril Aris | Sofia Coppola |
| Main cast | Camille Salameh, Julia Kassar, Mounia Akl, Hasan Akil, Tino Karam | Bill Murray, Giovanni Ribisi, Anna Faris, Scarlett Johansson, Akiko Takeshita |
Synopsis
A Sad and Beautiful World
In this sweeping love story that spans three decades of passion, heartbreak, and hope, Nino and Yasmina find themselves drawn together by a magnetic relationship. As they face an impossible choice between love and survival, they must decide if they want to build a family and chart a path to happiness in Lebanon, despite the tragedies ravaging the country.
Lost in Translation
Two lost souls visiting Tokyo -- the young, neglected wife of a photographer and a washed-up movie star shooting a TV commercial -- find an odd solace and pensive freedom to be real in each other's company, away from their lives in America.
Where to watch
Where to watch A Sad and Beautiful WorldWhere to watch Lost in Translation
More like A Sad and Beautiful World · More like Lost in Translation · Compare other titles