A Score to Settle vs Undisputed III: Redemption
Undisputed III: Redemption has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 5.8/10 for A Score to Settle). Undisputed III: Redemption is the shorter watch at 1h 36m compared with 1h 43m. Undisputed III: Redemption is the older of the two (2010 against 2019). Both are action, crime, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
A Score to Settle
Undisputed III: Redemption| A Score to Settle | Undisputed III: Redemption | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.8/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2019 | 2010 |
| Length | 1h 43m | 1h 36m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller | Action, Crime, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | Canada | United States of America |
| Director | Shawn Ku | Isaac Florentine |
| Main cast | Benjamin Bratt, Nicolas Cage, Carmel Amit, Ian Tracey, Karolina Wydra | Mark Ivanir, Robert Costanzo, Hristo Shopov, Scott Adkins, Marko Zaror |
Synopsis
A Score to Settle
A former mob enforcer who is released from prison after serving 22 years for a crime he didn't commit sets out on a path for revenge against the people who wronged him.
Undisputed III: Redemption
Russian inmate Boyka, now severely hobbled by the knee injury suffered at the end of Undisputed 2. No longer the feared prison fighter he was, he has declined so far that he is now good only for cleaning toilets. But when a new prison fight tournament begins - an international affair, matching the best fighters from prisons around the globe, enticing them with the promise of freedom for the winner - Boyka must reclaim his dignity and fight for…
Where to watch
Where to watch A Score to SettleWhere to watch Undisputed III: Redemption
More like A Score to Settle · More like Undisputed III: Redemption · Compare other titles