A Walk Among the Tombstones vs In the Line of Fire
In the Line of Fire has the higher audience score (7/10 against 6.3/10 for A Walk Among the Tombstones). A Walk Among the Tombstones is the shorter watch at 1h 54m compared with 2h 8m. In the Line of Fire is the older of the two (1993 against 2014). Both are crime, drama, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
A Walk Among the Tombstones
In the Line of Fire| A Walk Among the Tombstones | In the Line of Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.3/10 | ★ 7.0/10 |
| Year | 2014 | 1993 |
| Length | 1h 54m | 2h 8m |
| Genres | Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller | Action, Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | Scott Frank | Wolfgang Petersen |
| Main cast | Dan Stevens, David Harbour, Ólafur Darri Ólafsson, Liam Neeson, Laura Birn | Gary Cole, Dylan McDermott, Gregory Alan Williams, Tobin Bell, Clint Eastwood |
Synopsis
A Walk Among the Tombstones
Private investigator Matthew Scudder is hired by a drug kingpin to find out who kidnapped and murdered his wife.
In the Line of Fire
Veteran Secret Service agent Frank Horrigan is a man haunted by his failure to save President Kennedy while serving protection detail in Dallas. Thirty years later, a man calling himself "Booth" threatens the life of the current President, forcing Horrigan to come back to protection detail to confront the ghosts from his past.
Where to watch
Where to watch A Walk Among the TombstonesWhere to watch In the Line of Fire
More like A Walk Among the Tombstones · More like In the Line of Fire · Compare other titles