Acts of Vengeance vs Man on Fire
Man on Fire has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6/10 for Acts of Vengeance). Acts of Vengeance is the shorter watch at 1h 27m compared with 2h 26m. Man on Fire is the older of the two (2004 against 2017). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Acts of Vengeance
Man on Fire| Acts of Vengeance | Man on Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.0/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2017 | 2004 |
| Length | 1h 27m | 2h 26m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Isaac Florentine | Tony Scott |
| Main cast | Karl Urban, Robert Forster, Antonio Banderas, Tim Man, Mark Rhino Smith | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke |
Synopsis
Acts of Vengeance
A fast-talking lawyer transforms his body and takes a vow of silence, not to be broken until he finds out who killed his wife and daughter and has his revenge.
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
Where to watch
Where to watch Acts of VengeanceWhere to watch Man on Fire
More like Acts of Vengeance · More like Man on Fire · Compare other titles