Adaptation. vs To Die For
Adaptation. has the higher audience score (7.4/10 against 6.6/10 for To Die For). To Die For is the shorter watch at 1h 46m compared with 1h 55m. To Die For is the older of the two (1995 against 2002). Both are comedy, crime, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Adaptation.
To Die For| Adaptation. | To Die For | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.4/10 | ★ 6.6/10 |
| Year | 2002 | 1995 |
| Length | 1h 55m | 1h 46m |
| Genres | Comedy, Crime, Drama | Comedy, Crime, Drama |
| Country | – | United Kingdom |
| Director | Spike Jonze | Gus Van Sant |
| Main cast | Doug Jones, Jim Beaver, Chris Cooper, Cara Seymour, Nicolas Cage | Nicole Kidman, Joaquin Phoenix, Dan Hedaya, Wayne Knight, Illeana Douglas |
Synopsis
Adaptation.
Charlie Kaufman is a confused L.A. screenwriter overwhelmed by feelings of inadequacy, sexual frustration, self-loathing, and by the screenwriting ambitions of his freeloading twin brother Donald. While struggling to adapt "The Orchid Thief," by Susan Orlean, Kaufman's life spins from pathetic to bizarre. The lives of Kaufman, Orlean's book, become strangely intertwined as each one's search for passion collides with the others'.
To Die For
Suzanne Stone wants to be a world-famous news anchor and she is willing to do anything to get what she wants. What she lacks in intelligence, she makes up for in cold determination and diabolical wiles. As she pursues her goal with relentless focus, she is forced to destroy anything and anyone that may stand in her way, regardless of the ultimate cost or means necessary.
Where to watch
Where to watch Adaptation.Where to watch To Die For
More like Adaptation. · More like To Die For · Compare other titles