Agent Cody Banks vs Puss in Boots
Puss in Boots has the higher audience score (6.6/10 against 5.5/10 for Agent Cody Banks). Puss in Boots is the shorter watch at 1h 30m compared with 1h 42m. Agent Cody Banks is the older of the two (2003 against 2011). Both are action, adventure, comedy movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Agent Cody Banks
Puss in Boots| Agent Cody Banks | Puss in Boots | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.5/10 | ★ 6.6/10 |
| Year | 2003 | 2011 |
| Length | 1h 42m | 1h 30m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Comedy, Family | Action, Adventure, Animation, Comedy, Family, Fantasy |
| Country | – | United States of America |
| Director | Harald Zwart | Chris Miller |
| Main cast | Ian McShane, Keith David, Frankie Muniz, Harry Van Gorkum, Martin Donovan | Amy Sedaris, Constance Marie, Billy Bob Thornton, Salma Hayek Pinault, Guillermo del Toro |
Synopsis
Agent Cody Banks
Recruited by the U.S. government to be a special agent, nerdy teenager Cody Banks must get closer to cute classmate Natalie in order to learn about an evil plan hatched by her father. But despite the agent persona, Cody struggles with teen angst.
Puss in Boots
Long before he even met Shrek, the notorious fighter, lover and outlaw Puss in Boots becomes a hero when he sets off on an adventure with the tough and street smart Kitty Softpaws and the mastermind Humpty Dumpty to save his town. This is the true story of The Cat, The Myth, The Legend... The Boots.
Where to watch
Where to watch Agent Cody BanksWhere to watch Puss in Boots
More like Agent Cody Banks · More like Puss in Boots · Compare other titles