Amanda Knox vs Bowling for Columbine
Bowling for Columbine has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.6/10 for Amanda Knox). Amanda Knox is the shorter watch at 1h 32m compared with 2h . Bowling for Columbine is the older of the two (2002 against 2016). Both are crime, documentary movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Amanda Knox
Bowling for Columbine| Amanda Knox | Bowling for Columbine | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.6/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2016 | 2002 |
| Length | 1h 32m | 2h |
| Genres | Crime, Documentary | Crime, Documentary, Drama |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Brian McGinn, Rod Blackhurst | Michael Moore |
| Main cast | Amanda Knox, Raffaele Sollecito, Rudy Guede | Michael Moore, Charlton Heston, Dick Clark, George W. Bush, George H. W. Bush |
Synopsis
Amanda Knox
This gripping, atmospheric documentary recounts the infamous trial, conviction and eventual acquittal of Seattle native Amanda Knox for the 2007 murder of a British exchange student in Italy.
Bowling for Columbine
This is not a film about gun control. It is a film about the fearful heart and soul of the United States, and the 280 million Americans lucky enough to have the right to a constitutionally protected Uzi. From a look at the Columbine High School security camera tapes to the home of Oscar-winning NRA President Charlton Heston, from a young man who makes homemade napalm with The Anarchist's Cookbook to the murder of a six-year-old girl by another…
Where to watch
Where to watch Amanda KnoxWhere to watch Bowling for Columbine
More like Amanda Knox · More like Bowling for Columbine · Compare other titles