Antiviral vs Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 6/10 for Antiviral). Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the shorter watch at 1h 2m compared with 1h 50m. Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the older of the two (2009 against 2012). Both are horror, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Antiviral | Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.0/10 | ★ 7.9/10 |
| Year | 2012 | 2009 |
| Length | 1h 50m | 1h 2m |
| Genres | Horror, Science Fiction | Adventure, Drama, Horror, Mystery, Science Fiction, TV Movie |
| Country | Canada | United Kingdom |
| Director | Brandon Cronenberg | Graeme Harper |
| Main cast | Malcolm McDowell, Nicholas Campbell, Douglas Smith, Wendy Crewson, Joe Pingue | Lindsay Duncan, David Tennant, Gemma Chan, Michael Goldsmith, Sharon Duncan-Brewster |
Synopsis
Antiviral
Syd March is an employee at a clinic that sells injections of live viruses harvested from sick celebrities to obsessed fans. When he becomes infected with the disease that kills super sensation Hannah Geist, Syd becomes a target for collectors and rabid fans. He must unravel the mystery surrounding her death before he suffers the same fate.
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
In a Mars base, the inhabitants are being infected by a mysterious water creature which takes over its victims. The Doctor is thrust into the middle of this catastrophe, knowing a larger one is waiting around the corner.
Where to watch
Where to watch AntiviralWhere to watch Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
More like Antiviral · More like Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars · Compare other titles
Antiviral
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars