Antiviral vs Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust
Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust has the higher audience score (7.6/10 against 6/10 for Antiviral). Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust is the shorter watch at 1h 43m compared with 1h 50m. Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust is the older of the two (2000 against 2012). Both are horror, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Antiviral
Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust| Antiviral | Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.0/10 | ★ 7.6/10 |
| Year | 2012 | 2000 |
| Length | 1h 50m | 1h 43m |
| Genres | Horror, Science Fiction | Action, Adventure, Animation, Fantasy, Horror, Science Fiction |
| Country | Canada | Japan |
| Director | Brandon Cronenberg | Yoshiaki Kawajiri |
| Main cast | Malcolm McDowell, Nicholas Campbell, Douglas Smith, Wendy Crewson, Joe Pingue | Takeshi Aono, Yoko Soumi, Hideyuki Tanaka, Koichi Yamadera, Megumi Hayashibara |
Synopsis
Antiviral
Syd March is an employee at a clinic that sells injections of live viruses harvested from sick celebrities to obsessed fans. When he becomes infected with the disease that kills super sensation Hannah Geist, Syd becomes a target for collectors and rabid fans. He must unravel the mystery surrounding her death before he suffers the same fate.
Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust
D, a legendary dhampir competes with a motley family of bounty hunters to track down Charlotte Elbourne, a young woman who has seemingly been abducted by vampire nobleman Meier Link.
Where to watch
Where to watch AntiviralWhere to watch Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust
More like Antiviral · More like Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust · Compare other titles