Ants in the Pants vs In a Heartbeat
In a Heartbeat has the higher audience score (8/10 against 5/10 for Ants in the Pants). In a Heartbeat is the shorter watch at 4m compared with 1h 35m. Ants in the Pants is the older of the two (2000 against 2017). Both are comedy, romance movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Ants in the Pants | In a Heartbeat | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.0/10 | ★ 8.0/10 |
| Year | 2000 | 2017 |
| Length | 1h 35m | 4m |
| Genres | Comedy, Romance | Animation, Comedy, Romance |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Marc Rothemund | Beth David, Esteban Bravo |
| Main cast | Mina Tander, Tobias Schenke, Axel Stein, Luise Helm, Sissi Perlinger | Nick Ainsworth, Kelly Donohue |
Synopsis
Ants in the Pants
Flo is not quite a normal teenager: While all his friends only think about sex he can't even pronounce the word "S - E - X". But everything changes completely when one morning Flo wakes up from a strange call. His penis, excited for the first time, begins to talk to him. He claims that Flo severely neglected him for 15 years and it's time to release him.
In a Heartbeat
A closeted boy runs the risk of being outed by his own heart after it pops out of his chest to chase down the boy of his dreams.
Where to watch
Where to watch Ants in the PantsWhere to watch In a Heartbeat
More like Ants in the Pants · More like In a Heartbeat · Compare other titles
Ants in the Pants
In a Heartbeat