Armageddon vs Bleeding Steel
Armageddon has the higher audience score (6.8/10 against 6/10 for Bleeding Steel). Bleeding Steel is the shorter watch at 1h 49m compared with 2h 31m. Armageddon is the older of the two (1998 against 2017). Both are action, adventure, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Armageddon | Bleeding Steel | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 6.8/10 | ★ 6.0/10 |
| Year | 1998 | 2017 |
| Length | 2h 31m | 1h 49m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Science Fiction, Thriller | Action, Adventure, Science Fiction, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Michael Bay | Leo Zhang |
| Main cast | Liv Tyler, Steve Buscemi, Owen Wilson, Peter Stormare, Billy Bob Thornton | Damien Garvey, Jackie Chan, Brahim Achabbakhe, Callan Mulvey, Temur Mamisashvili |
Synopsis
Armageddon
When an asteroid threatens to collide with Earth, NASA honcho Dan Truman determines the only way to stop it is to drill into its surface and detonate a nuclear bomb. This leads him to renowned driller Harry Stamper, who agrees to helm the dangerous space mission provided he can bring along his own hotshot crew. Among them is the cocksure A.J. who Harry thinks isn't good enough for his daughter, until the mission proves otherwise.
Bleeding Steel
Jackie Chan stars as a hardened special forces agent who fights to protect a young woman from a sinister criminal gang. At the same time, he feels a special connection to the young woman, like they met in a different life.
Where to watch
Where to watch ArmageddonWhere to watch Bleeding Steel
More like Armageddon · More like Bleeding Steel · Compare other titles
Armageddon
Bleeding Steel