Armored vs In the Line of Fire
In the Line of Fire has the higher audience score (7/10 against 5.7/10 for Armored). Armored is the shorter watch at 1h 28m compared with 2h 8m. In the Line of Fire is the older of the two (1993 against 2009). Both are action, crime, drama movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Armored
In the Line of Fire| Armored | In the Line of Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.7/10 | ★ 7.0/10 |
| Year | 2009 | 1993 |
| Length | 1h 28m | 2h 8m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller | Action, Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Nimród Antal | Wolfgang Petersen |
| Main cast | Amaury Nolasco, Laurence Fishburne, Fred Ward, Jean Reno, Skeet Ulrich | Gary Cole, Dylan McDermott, Gregory Alan Williams, Tobin Bell, Clint Eastwood |
Synopsis
Armored
A crew of officers at an armored transport security firm risk their lives when they embark on the ultimate heist against their own company. Armed with a seemingly fool-proof plan, the men plan on making off with a fortune with harm to none. But when an unexpected witness interferes, the plan quickly unravels and all bets are off.
In the Line of Fire
Veteran Secret Service agent Frank Horrigan is a man haunted by his failure to save President Kennedy while serving protection detail in Dallas. Thirty years later, a man calling himself "Booth" threatens the life of the current President, forcing Horrigan to come back to protection detail to confront the ghosts from his past.
Where to watch
Where to watch ArmoredWhere to watch In the Line of Fire
More like Armored · More like In the Line of Fire · Compare other titles