Armored vs Stone
Armored has the higher audience score (5.7/10 against 5.3/10 for Stone). Armored is the shorter watch at 1h 28m compared with 1h 45m. Armored is the older of the two (2009 against 2010). Both are action, drama, mystery movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Armored
Stone| Armored | Stone | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.7/10 | ★ 5.3/10 |
| Year | 2009 | 2010 |
| Length | 1h 28m | 1h 45m |
| Genres | Action, Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller | Action, Drama, Mystery, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Nimród Antal | John Curran |
| Main cast | Amaury Nolasco, Laurence Fishburne, Fred Ward, Jean Reno, Skeet Ulrich | Enver Gjokaj, Frances Conroy, Robert De Niro, Milla Jovovich, Edward Norton |
Synopsis
Armored
A crew of officers at an armored transport security firm risk their lives when they embark on the ultimate heist against their own company. Armed with a seemingly fool-proof plan, the men plan on making off with a fortune with harm to none. But when an unexpected witness interferes, the plan quickly unravels and all bets are off.
Stone
Parole officer Jack Mabry has only a few weeks left before retirement and wishes to finish out the cases he's been assigned. One such case is that of Gerald 'Stone' Creeson, a convicted arsonist who is up for parole. Jack is initially reluctant to indulge Stone in the coarse banter he wishes to pursue and feels little sympathy for the prisoner's pleads for an early release. Seeing little hope in convincing Jack himself, Stone arranges for his…