Assault on Wall Street vs Man on Fire
Man on Fire has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 5.9/10 for Assault on Wall Street). Assault on Wall Street is the shorter watch at 1h 39m compared with 2h 26m. Man on Fire is the older of the two (2004 against 2013). Both are action, drama, thriller movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Assault on Wall Street
Man on Fire| Assault on Wall Street | Man on Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.9/10 | ★ 7.5/10 |
| Year | 2013 | 2004 |
| Length | 1h 39m | 2h 26m |
| Genres | Action, Drama, Thriller | Action, Drama, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Uwe Boll | Tony Scott |
| Main cast | Dominic Purcell, Keith David, Michael Paré, Lochlyn Munro, Clint Howard | Dakota Fanning, Christopher Walken, Denzel Washington, Radha Mitchell, Mickey Rourke |
Synopsis
Assault on Wall Street
Jim is an average New Yorker living a peaceful life with a well paying job and a loving family. Suddenly, everything changes when the economy crashes causing Jim to lose everything. Filled with anger and rage, Jim snaps and goes to extreme lengths to seek revenge for the life taken from him.
Man on Fire
Jaded ex-CIA operative John Creasy reluctantly accepts a job as the bodyguard for a 10-year-old girl in Mexico City. They clash at first, but eventually bond, and when she's kidnapped he's consumed by fury and will stop at nothing to save her life.
Where to watch
Where to watch Assault on Wall StreetWhere to watch Man on Fire
More like Assault on Wall Street · More like Man on Fire · Compare other titles