At World's End vs RED
RED has the higher audience score (6.7/10 against 5.5/10 for At World's End). At World's End is the shorter watch at 1h 39m compared with 1h 51m. At World's End is the older of the two (2009 against 2010). Both are action, adventure, comedy movies, so they suit a similar mood.
At World's End
RED| At World's End | RED | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.5/10 | ★ 6.7/10 |
| Year | 2009 | 2010 |
| Length | 1h 39m | 1h 51m |
| Genres | Action, Adventure, Comedy, Thriller | Action, Adventure, Comedy, Crime, Thriller |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Tomas Villum Jensen | Robert Schwentke |
| Main cast | Nikolaj Coster-Waldau, Nikolaj Lie Kaas, Kee Chan, Ulf Pilgaard, Bille Brown | James Remar, Brian Cox, Karl Urban, Mary-Louise Parker, Helen Mirren |
Synopsis
At World's End
An english tv-team discovers a special white flower in the indonesian rainforest, but they never get to investegate it further, before the danish recluse Severin has shot them down. A danish special enforcement with a psychiatrist in front is sent off, and they find out, that Severin claims, that he is 129 years old, and it's the flower, which keeps him young. Soon all hunts the white flower, which apparently gives eternal life.
RED
After surviving an assault from a squad of hit men, retired CIA black ops agent Frank Moses reassembles his old team for an all-out war. Frank reunites with old Joe, crazy Marvin and wily Victoria to uncover a massive conspiracy that threatens their lives. Only their expert training will allow them to survive a near-impossible mission -- breaking into CIA headquarters.
Where to watch
Where to watch At World's EndWhere to watch RED
More like At World's End · More like RED · Compare other titles