Audition vs Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 7.1/10 for Audition). Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars is the shorter watch at 1h 2m compared with 1h 55m. Audition is the older of the two (2000 against 2009). Both are drama, horror movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Audition
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars| Audition | Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.1/10 | ★ 7.9/10 |
| Year | 2000 | 2009 |
| Length | 1h 55m | 1h 2m |
| Genres | Drama, Horror | Adventure, Drama, Horror, Mystery, Science Fiction, TV Movie |
| Country | – | United Kingdom |
| Director | Takashi Miike | Graeme Harper |
| Main cast | Fumiyo Kohinata, Ryo Ishibashi, Eihi Shiina, Jun Kunimura, Tetsu Sawaki | Lindsay Duncan, David Tennant, Gemma Chan, Michael Goldsmith, Sharon Duncan-Brewster |
Synopsis
Audition
Seven years after the death of his wife, widower Shigeharu seeks advice on how to find a new wife from a colleague. Taking advantage of their position as a film company, they stage an audition. Interviewing a series of women, Shigeharu is enchanted by the quiet Asami. But soon things take a twisted turn as Asami isn’t what she seems to be.
Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
In a Mars base, the inhabitants are being infected by a mysterious water creature which takes over its victims. The Doctor is thrust into the middle of this catastrophe, knowing a larger one is waiting around the corner.
Where to watch
Where to watch AuditionWhere to watch Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars
More like Audition · More like Doctor Who: The Waters of Mars · Compare other titles