Back to the Future Part II vs Back to the Future Part III

Back to the Future Part II has the higher audience score (7.8/10 against 7.5/10 for Back to the Future Part III). Back to the Future Part II is the shorter watch at 1h 48m compared with 1h 59m. Back to the Future Part II is the older of the two (1989 against 1990). Both are adventure, comedy, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood. Both feature Elisabeth Shue, Lea Thompson, James Tolkan.

Back to the Future Part II posterBack to the Future Part II1989 VS Back to the Future Part III posterBack to the Future Part III1990
Back to the Future Part IIBack to the Future Part III
Audience score★ 7.8/10★ 7.5/10
Year19891990
Length1h 48m1h 59m
GenresAdventure, Comedy, Science FictionAdventure, Comedy, Science Fiction
Country––
DirectorRobert ZemeckisRobert Zemeckis
Main castElisabeth Shue, Lea Thompson, Charles Fleischer, James Tolkan, Thomas F. WilsonElisabeth Shue, Mary Steenburgen, Lea Thompson, Wendie Jo Sperber, James Tolkan

Synopsis

Back to the Future Part II

Marty and Doc are at it again as the time-traveling duo head to 2015 to nip some McFly family woes in the bud. But things go awry thanks to bully Biff Tannen and a pesky sports almanac. In a last-ditch attempt to set things straight, Marty finds himself bound for 1955 and face to face with his teenage parents -- again.

Back to the Future Part III

The final installment finds Marty digging the trusty DeLorean out of a mineshaft and looking for Doc in the Wild West of 1885. But when their time machine breaks down, the travelers are stranded in a land of spurs. More problems arise when Doc falls for pretty schoolteacher Clara Clayton, and Marty tangles with Buford Tannen.

Where to watch

Where to watch Back to the Future Part IIWhere to watch Back to the Future Part III

More like Back to the Future Part II · More like Back to the Future Part III · Compare other titles