Back to the Future Part II vs Land of the Lost

Back to the Future Part II has the higher audience score (7.8/10 against 5.4/10 for Land of the Lost). Land of the Lost is the shorter watch at 1h 42m compared with 1h 48m. Back to the Future Part II is the older of the two (1989 against 2009). Both are adventure, comedy, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.

Back to the Future Part II posterBack to the Future Part II1989 VS Land of the Lost posterLand of the Lost2009
Back to the Future Part IILand of the Lost
Audience score★ 7.8/10★ 5.4/10
Year19892009
Length1h 48m1h 42m
GenresAdventure, Comedy, Science FictionAdventure, Comedy, Science Fiction
Country––
DirectorRobert ZemeckisBrad Silberling
Main castElisabeth Shue, Lea Thompson, Charles Fleischer, James Tolkan, Thomas F. WilsonDanny McBride, Will Ferrell, Anna Friel, Jorma Taccone, Sierra McCormick

Synopsis

Back to the Future Part II

Marty and Doc are at it again as the time-traveling duo head to 2015 to nip some McFly family woes in the bud. But things go awry thanks to bully Biff Tannen and a pesky sports almanac. In a last-ditch attempt to set things straight, Marty finds himself bound for 1955 and face to face with his teenage parents -- again.

Land of the Lost

On his latest expedition, has-been scientist Dr. Rick Marshall is sucked into a space-time vortex alongside his crack-smart research assistant Holly and redneck survivalist Will into a world populated by marauding dinosaurs and painfully slow creatures called Sleestaks. With no weapons, few skills and questionable smarts, the trio must rely on their only ally, a primate named Chaka, to try to survive long enough to figure out a way back home.

Where to watch

Where to watch Back to the Future Part IIWhere to watch Land of the Lost

More like Back to the Future Part II · More like Land of the Lost · Compare other titles