Back to the Future Part II vs Love and Monsters
Back to the Future Part II has the higher audience score (7.8/10 against 7.3/10 for Love and Monsters). Back to the Future Part II is the shorter watch at 1h 48m compared with 1h 49m. Back to the Future Part II is the older of the two (1989 against 2020). Both are adventure, comedy, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.
| Back to the Future Part II | Love and Monsters | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.8/10 | ★ 7.3/10 |
| Year | 1989 | 2020 |
| Length | 1h 48m | 1h 49m |
| Genres | Adventure, Comedy, Science Fiction | Adventure, Comedy, Science Fiction |
| Country | – | – |
| Director | Robert Zemeckis | Michael Matthews |
| Main cast | Elisabeth Shue, Lea Thompson, Charles Fleischer, James Tolkan, Thomas F. Wilson | Ellen Hollman, Jessica Henwick, Amali Golden, Michael Rooker, Te Kohe Tuhaka |
Synopsis
Back to the Future Part II
Marty and Doc are at it again as the time-traveling duo head to 2015 to nip some McFly family woes in the bud. But things go awry thanks to bully Biff Tannen and a pesky sports almanac. In a last-ditch attempt to set things straight, Marty finds himself bound for 1955 and face to face with his teenage parents -- again.
Love and Monsters
Seven years since the Monsterpocalypse began, Joel Dawson has been living underground in order to survive. But after reconnecting over radio with his high school girlfriend Aimee, Joel decides to venture out to reunite with her, despite all the dangerous monsters that stand in his way.
Where to watch
Where to watch Back to the Future Part IIWhere to watch Love and Monsters
More like Back to the Future Part II · More like Love and Monsters · Compare other titles
Back to the Future Part II
Love and Monsters