Back to the Future Part II vs Paul
Back to the Future Part II has the higher audience score (7.8/10 against 6.7/10 for Paul). Paul is the shorter watch at 1h 44m compared with 1h 48m. Back to the Future Part II is the older of the two (1989 against 2011). Both are adventure, comedy, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Back to the Future Part II
Paul| Back to the Future Part II | Paul | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.8/10 | ★ 6.7/10 |
| Year | 1989 | 2011 |
| Length | 1h 48m | 1h 44m |
| Genres | Adventure, Comedy, Science Fiction | Adventure, Comedy, Science Fiction |
| Country | – | United Kingdom |
| Director | Robert Zemeckis | Greg Mottola |
| Main cast | Elisabeth Shue, Lea Thompson, Charles Fleischer, James Tolkan, Thomas F. Wilson | Nick Frost, Jane Lynch, Jason Bateman, Joe Lo Truglio, Bill Hader |
Synopsis
Back to the Future Part II
Marty and Doc are at it again as the time-traveling duo head to 2015 to nip some McFly family woes in the bud. But things go awry thanks to bully Biff Tannen and a pesky sports almanac. In a last-ditch attempt to set things straight, Marty finds himself bound for 1955 and face to face with his teenage parents -- again.
Paul
For the past 60 years, a space-traveling smart-ass named Paul has been locked up in a top-secret military base, advising world leaders about his kind. But when he worries he’s outlived his usefulness and the dissection table is drawing uncomfortably close, Paul escapes on the first RV that passes by his compound in Area 51. Fortunately, it contains the two earthlings who are most likely to rescue and harbor an alien on the run.
Where to watch
Where to watch Back to the Future Part IIWhere to watch Paul
More like Back to the Future Part II · More like Paul · Compare other titles