Back to the Future Part III vs Land of the Lost

Back to the Future Part III has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 5.4/10 for Land of the Lost). Land of the Lost is the shorter watch at 1h 42m compared with 1h 59m. Back to the Future Part III is the older of the two (1990 against 2009). Both are adventure, comedy, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.

Back to the Future Part III posterBack to the Future Part III1990 VS Land of the Lost posterLand of the Lost2009
Back to the Future Part IIILand of the Lost
Audience score★ 7.5/10★ 5.4/10
Year19902009
Length1h 59m1h 42m
GenresAdventure, Comedy, Science FictionAdventure, Comedy, Science Fiction
Country––
DirectorRobert ZemeckisBrad Silberling
Main castElisabeth Shue, Mary Steenburgen, Lea Thompson, Wendie Jo Sperber, James TolkanDanny McBride, Will Ferrell, Anna Friel, Jorma Taccone, Sierra McCormick

Synopsis

Back to the Future Part III

The final installment finds Marty digging the trusty DeLorean out of a mineshaft and looking for Doc in the Wild West of 1885. But when their time machine breaks down, the travelers are stranded in a land of spurs. More problems arise when Doc falls for pretty schoolteacher Clara Clayton, and Marty tangles with Buford Tannen.

Land of the Lost

On his latest expedition, has-been scientist Dr. Rick Marshall is sucked into a space-time vortex alongside his crack-smart research assistant Holly and redneck survivalist Will into a world populated by marauding dinosaurs and painfully slow creatures called Sleestaks. With no weapons, few skills and questionable smarts, the trio must rely on their only ally, a primate named Chaka, to try to survive long enough to figure out a way back home.

Where to watch

Where to watch Back to the Future Part IIIWhere to watch Land of the Lost

More like Back to the Future Part III · More like Land of the Lost · Compare other titles