Back to the Future Part III vs Paul
Back to the Future Part III has the higher audience score (7.5/10 against 6.7/10 for Paul). Paul is the shorter watch at 1h 44m compared with 1h 59m. Back to the Future Part III is the older of the two (1990 against 2011). Both are adventure, comedy, science fiction movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Back to the Future Part III
Paul| Back to the Future Part III | Paul | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 7.5/10 | ★ 6.7/10 |
| Year | 1990 | 2011 |
| Length | 1h 59m | 1h 44m |
| Genres | Adventure, Comedy, Science Fiction | Adventure, Comedy, Science Fiction |
| Country | – | United Kingdom |
| Director | Robert Zemeckis | Greg Mottola |
| Main cast | Elisabeth Shue, Mary Steenburgen, Lea Thompson, Wendie Jo Sperber, James Tolkan | Nick Frost, Jane Lynch, Jason Bateman, Joe Lo Truglio, Bill Hader |
Synopsis
Back to the Future Part III
The final installment finds Marty digging the trusty DeLorean out of a mineshaft and looking for Doc in the Wild West of 1885. But when their time machine breaks down, the travelers are stranded in a land of spurs. More problems arise when Doc falls for pretty schoolteacher Clara Clayton, and Marty tangles with Buford Tannen.
Paul
For the past 60 years, a space-traveling smart-ass named Paul has been locked up in a top-secret military base, advising world leaders about his kind. But when he worries he’s outlived his usefulness and the dissection table is drawing uncomfortably close, Paul escapes on the first RV that passes by his compound in Area 51. Fortunately, it contains the two earthlings who are most likely to rescue and harbor an alien on the run.
Where to watch
Where to watch Back to the Future Part IIIWhere to watch Paul
More like Back to the Future Part III · More like Paul · Compare other titles