Balls of Fury vs Estômago: A Gastronomic Story
Estômago: A Gastronomic Story has the higher audience score (7.9/10 against 5.3/10 for Balls of Fury). Balls of Fury is the shorter watch at 1h 30m compared with 1h 53m. Both are comedy, crime movies, so they suit a similar mood.
Balls of Fury
Estômago: A Gastronomic Story| Balls of Fury | Estômago: A Gastronomic Story | |
|---|---|---|
| Audience score | ★ 5.3/10 | ★ 7.9/10 |
| Year | 2007 | 2007 |
| Length | 1h 30m | 1h 53m |
| Genres | Comedy, Crime | Comedy, Crime, Drama, Mystery |
| Country | United States of America | – |
| Director | Robert Ben Garant | Marcos Jorge |
| Main cast | Maggie Q, Aisha Tyler, Robert Patrick, Terry Crews, Christopher Walken | Fabiula Nascimento, João Miguel, Babu Santana, Carlo Briani, Zeca Cenovicz |
Synopsis
Balls of Fury
Randy Daytona was a child ping pong prodigy who lost his chance at Olympic gold when his father is murdered by the mysterious Feng over a gambling debt. 15yrs later he's down on his luck and scraping a living doing seedy back room shows in Vegas; when the FBI turn up and ask for his help to take down Feng... who just happens to love Ping Pong.
Estômago: A Gastronomic Story
In a dog-eat-dog world, Raimundo Nonato has found an alternative way to move ahead: he cooks. No matter what social strata this deceptively innocent young man inhabits, he hones his skills and sharpens his knives—and then he falls in love. Jorge's nimble comic fable provides a smartly constructed gastronomic allegory for ambition and survival.
Where to watch
Where to watch Balls of FuryWhere to watch Estômago: A Gastronomic Story
More like Balls of Fury · More like Estômago: A Gastronomic Story · Compare other titles